Comments on: Modern Warfare 2 on 360 vs PS3, Comparison Pics

By: boharris

boharris — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:43:33 +0000

how did you get two consoles on the same tv at the same time

By: Ver

Ver — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:44:21 +0000

Graphics aside. I’ve got a PS3 and my sister has a 360. Her 360 has red ringed 4 times now and has had to send it in for repairs each time taking a month to send it in get it repaired and send it back. I’ve never had any problem with my PS3.

By: zulu

zulu — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:38:08 +0000

I have all three consoles one would be a fool to side with one console over another and miss out on great games then have opinions about games you’ve never played and look like a jackass on the web cause you don’t know what you’re talking about all systems have their pros and cons from my experience multiplat games run slightly better on 360 yes mw2 was developed in parrallel not ported over thats an old 2007 argument that does’nt apply to third party titles at this stage also 3rd party games are the system sellers this generation so why do people continue to flame over first party titles when they consistently rank far below third party titles in sales and reviews now the 360 has both the best controller ever and the crappiest d pad ever all in one ps3 has most intuitive d pad married to an obsolete controller with analog sticks in wierd places the humle wii has a web browser that makes my ps3 web browser look shit slow but i can run linux on my ps3 no other console can do that not the shit stripped ps3 slim either if you can find the pre 2008 ps3 fat by all means buy it it’s the best iteration of ps3 available this illustrates the fact that 360 sku’s have continued to get better and better while ps3 continues to get less and less capable with each price drop 3rd party titles do look mostly the same most however run at 60 fps on 360 and run 30fps on ps3 even some exclusives like killzone 2 run at 30fps to preserve visual fidelity so explosions are carefully scripted to avoid judder such is the case with both modern warfare titles facts are facts both systems run the same basic power pc core no the triple core nor the cell is some wonderful new tech innovation it’s marketing speak for buy my machine so i bought them all i love my ps3 for fighting and rpg titles as the d pad is absolutely intuitive on the same token the 360 has the best controller ever no more holding my thumbs at the bottom of the controller to find the analog and knocking my big knuckles together ouch. the d pad sucks ass though so its’ more suited to games that require split second reactions but sucks at fighting games so i bought tekken 6 for ps3 and mw2 for 360 there the best of both worlds it is a well known but little mentioned fact that 360 has a much better graphics card and twice the ram so some games will look better it’s not a matter of games getting ported over althuough that was true several years ago it’s more about a developers willingness to sink their own money into the games which sony will not pay back thats why exclusives made by guerrilla and naughty dog ect. look so great they are whooly owned subsidiarys of sony and have access to better dev kits than independent studios which should be obvious most studios would go bankrupt trying to optimise sony gear as these title are almost always behind schedule so in a nutshell 360=gaming machine ps3=multimedia hub with gaming capabilities online play 360 hands down worth every penny 4 bucks a month psn free but lacking in features and mike usage so flame me if you want i’m hoping for a better experience when i buy my new launch console which im sure will make the current ones look shit

By: zulu

zulu — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:44:10 +0000

@Kezins

By: Myles

Myles — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:26:02 +0000

XBOX 360 is definitely better in those pics! thanks for the info

By: truth

truth — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:44:53 +0000

@Kezins proof is always in the text.on that last photo comparison,the 56m is clearly sharper on the 360.the 360 version is using the new modern warefare2 high texture streaming engine.cod4 doesnt even look this sharp for the reason mentioned above.

By: John

John — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:47:25 +0000

Yes this comparison is stupid… what if you are looking at this site on a crappy monitor? PS3 is always better. People don’t seem to understand what a Blu-Ray disc is and what it’s capibilties are. XBOX still runs off dvds, and Playstation suffers because of this. They game developers can’t make the game look better on PS3 because they wouldn’t sell XBOX games. You should actually compare games that are made exclusivley for the PS3 and XBOX respectively. You will find there is no comparison (Metal Gear Solid took full advantage of this fact visually)

By: erodz85

erodz85 — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:28:39 +0000

Josh, you made my panties wet

By: ji

ji — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:28:53 +0000

How long are people like you going to argue this point. they both have positive advantages from each other. the fact of the matter is PS3 is ahead of its time and gets held back to stay competitive with the 360.(its better for the gaming industry)

By: Josh

Josh — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:25:34 +0000

i believe this is attempt to push people into thinking 360 is a better picture and the fact is my ps3 does not look that dull in 1080P by any means and it is a 100 times better looking than these photos suggest. lets do some real work please