«

»

PSN Review: World at War Map Pack 1, Map is Everything

knee deep river carnage 500x281 PSN Review: World at War Map Pack 1, Map is Everything
Map Size is Important

First thing’s first.  I am a Call of Duty (“COD”) fan.  I must admit that I am a recent convert, as I joined the ranks of the COD community just over one year ago when COD 4 Modern Warfare was released.  Since then, it has consumed every aspect of my life;  my young children have grown quite accustomed to falling asleep to the sound of machine gun fire and artillery strikes, as I walk through the corridors of my office at work, I often take note of ideal places to stash  “bouncing betties,” and I’ve conditioned my wife to crawl in the prone position beneath my television set when I’m in the middle of a match.

With this in context, I’d like to share my thoughts on the recently released new maps pack made available last week. Four new maps are available (including the Zombie Asylum) titled: Nightfire, Knee Deep, Station and Verruckt. Nightfire allows you to wage a night campaign within the burning streets of Berlin. Knee Deep is a bit more classical as you engage your enemy across fortified Japanese bunkers. Station is a wreck, literally. You do battle in a bombed out, underground train station. The last of the maps, Verruckt, takes place in a Zombie Asylum.

station centerpoint 500x281 PSN Review: World at War Map Pack 1, Map is EverythingOn the plus side, each map is impressive and offers unique settings, brilliant artistry and imaginative design. Unfortunately, if I wrote an article on how great everything was, no one would read it. Accordingly, I’m hard pressed to share with you why I feel these new maps fall short of my very high expectations. It revolves around one theme; map size!

Some people feel that map size is highly overrated. I’ve heard the common phrase, “It’s not about the size of your map, rather how it navigates.” Conversely, a satisfying game play experience does revolve around the size of your map, and contrary to what you might be thinking; it’s the smaller maps that count!

The best maps COD (4 or 5) have to offer for online play are the small to medium sized maps for several reasons. First, no one wants to spend half of the time traveling to the action. Often times you find yourself respawning at the furthest points from the action. The travel time often dulls the game play experience, especially when your killed by a random, hiding camper forcing you to respawn at the same point all over again. Let’s face it, people want to maximize the amount of time in combat, not racing to the action, and judging by the size of these new maps, you better have the Extreme Conditioning Perk handy.

knee deep village 500x281 PSN Review: World at War Map Pack 1, Map is EverythingThe current match play doesn’t allow for teams large enough to cover the size of these maps. Even on a big night (i.e., Friday and Saturday nights), any given match typically supports 7-10 players on a team (assuming your playing Team Deathmatch). These maps are simply too large for even the largest Team Deathmatch format on a busy night. As I played them, I observed that most of the players hovered to one section of the map and remained there for the entire round. Although this occurred at different places throughout the map as different rounds were played, I couldn’t help but wonder what a waste of space all the other parts of the map were at any give time.

Private matches are particularly fun because you get to showcase your skills against your family and friends who are also part of the COD family. The problem is that private matches are even smaller than when you’re playing on-line matches. The result, you find yourself playing the Shipment (COD 4) or Dome (COD 5) maps until you’re nauseous. I tend to grow tired of private matches with my friends because of the lack of smaller map options. This recent release of new maps offered no smaller maps to cater to this demand, hence, I was left wanting more. The Knee Deep map is my favorite of the four, and last I checked, it was a medium sized map.

If large maps are a must, then a different angle should be considered; force players to utilize the entire map during game play. For example, it would be interesting to see an explosion closing down a portion (or portions) of the Station map. Perhaps making certain areas within a map sensitive to explosive devices such as artillery, grenades and better yet, my favorite, Bouncing Betties! This would mean that you start on a large map but end the round on a small or medium map. This would make those larger maps a bit more appealing to play.

verruckt watch your back 500x281 PSN Review: World at War Map Pack 1, Map is Everything

I close by leaving our well respected creators at Treyarch with this message: Size is everything! Scale back on the size of your maps or get more creative with the larger ones. Current game play is does not allow for teams large enough to cover the ground created on large maps. As a result, combat action is compartmentalized into sections of a map at any given time; wasted space. Focus more on how to keep the combat experience alive through small to medium sized maps or by getting more creative on the larger scaled maps. And in case you’ve forgotten, WE LOVE YOU!! Looking forward to November 10, 2009!!

pixel PSN Review: World at War Map Pack 1, Map is Everything

5 comments

1 ping

Skip to comment form

  1. mrjuandrful

    I’m sure snipers will disagree with you on this, since they thrive on distance. But I will agree that these new maps require a good set on running shoes.

    Smaller maps tend to equate more deaths. I guess by splitting us up after a death, Treyarch is hoping you’d appreciate your players life just a tad bit more or the consequences is a good hike!

    For my map, I’d want 12 players in a raquetball sized court with mentos, diet coke and a pair of left handed scissors. Why were there always extra’s in my art class?

  2. Gamer

    I’m not sure what to say here. You say that the maps are too big. But most of the action congregates around one area. But you think the maps should force people to use the entire map because you are worried about wasted space?

    I think the statements you made in the third paragraph about having to write something bad to get readers shows your motive perfectly.

    If people congregate to a larger fight in one area of the map, that solves the size problem. Why are you worried about “wasted space” at all anyway? Are you afraid you will be charged more for the extra space? You are not buying a house. You are playing a game.

    I’m glad you had no input in the design process of these maps. If you had, I’m quite sure there would be plenty of negatives to write about. I think they’re great exactly the way they are. And I also think you COULD write about that and people would still read it.

  3. jomocpa

    Thank you for your insight. I’d like to start by disarming you a bit as your remarks are somewhat defensive and then turn to insult. A simple class in reading comprehension would have enabled you to deduce that 1)the writer enjoys playing Call of Duty, 2) the writer compliments the “artistry and imaginative design” of the maps, and 3) the writer concludes by paying homage to the creators. If it’s my motive you’re looking for, then ask for it, as it is apparent that you’ve already missed the obvious.

    I would like the talented people at Treyarch to consider making these great maps a bit smaller to improve the game-play experience. I offered my opinion as to why small to medium sized maps might be enjoyed more by the COD community.

    One other point I’d like you to consider is the importance of making sure you accurately interpret what is being written. You’ve provided an excellent example for everyone reading of this common error. I never said I was “worried” about the wasted space. I actally said “I couldn’t help but WONDER” about the wasted space. This pretty much makes void the only paragraph with substance in your comment. Pay attention kiddies, this is important if you’d like to get into a good college one day.

    Just in case you missed what I’m trying to say above, I’ll throw you a bone this one time:
    1) No need to get defensive
    2) Make sure you interpret what is being written correctly
    3) No need for insults

    Glad the article struck a nerve with you. That was the implied motive; Judging by your reaction, “Sucess!” (in Borat voice) :)

  4. erodz85

    @Gamer
    I’d have to say that i agree with Jomocpa. The maps, while they are great in design, don’t get me wrong about that, are to big to be 100% enjoyable. I find that my greatest frustration comes from the respawn points. yes, while there are these “congregated battles” going on, i find that 9 times out of 10, i and others will respawn well away from said battle. We spend more time running back to the battle than we do fighting in the battle.

    While Modern Warfare had great maps that were also large, such as Broadcast, Creek, and Chinatown, the respawn points were close enough that we can actually experience the hottest points in the battle.

    Kudos and 2 thumbs up to Jomocpa.

  5. erodz85

    @mrjuandrful
    “12 players in a raquetball sized court with mentos, diet coke and a pair of left handed scissors…”

    One of the Death Cards found in campaign mode, called Sticks and Stones make your weapon arsenal consist of a knife and rocks. But the left handed scissors would be great lol.

  1. HOT: ‘Call of Duty: World at War Map Pack 2′, Coming in June | PerezStart

    [...] on the heels of Map Pack 1, comes this latest installment of Treyarch / Activision latest announcement of Map Pack 2 for Call [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>